8 Hazardous & Real Cases of Hostile Work Environments

Unfortunately, there are many cases of hostile work environments across the United States.

At least 35% of people experience workplace harassment. These situations are often deemed “hostile” when a pervasive amount of harassment is present.

A situation can turn into unlawful harassment when the conduct becomes pervasive enough to be intimidating or abusive.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a government organization that helps employees stand up to companies after enduring harassment and/or a hostile work environment.

The EEOC determines whether a situation is illegal by determining if the alleged events violate…

Before I get into different cases of hostile work environments, it’s important to understand some key signs. After all, 34% of workers are unsure about what behaviors create a hostile environment.

Now that you have a brief understanding of what hostile work environments can look like, let’s look at 8 cases of hostile work environments brought to court in 2022.

Table of Contents

Amazon - July 2022

At least 24 employees at an Illinois, Amazon warehouse filed a complaint with the EEOC against their employer in July of 2022.

The complaint alleges that employees at the MDW2 Fulfillment Center , located outside of Chicago, endured…

Amazon terminated an employee at the beginning of July after voicing concerns about the death threats. Instead of addressing the situation, Amazon dismissed the threats and made no changes to the warehouse’s work environment.

A group of African American employees expects Amazon to address and resolve these issues promptly. They’re also seeking monetary damages for emotional duress caused by extremely stressful work environments.

Unfortunately, employees are hesitant to speak out against Amazon. They fear they will face further retaliation from the MDW2 Fulfillment Center’s management. Management told employees that if they speak out, they’ll face termination due to an agreement all employees signed when onboarding forcing them to remain silent.

This fear is a major cause of concern for the future of the lawsuit and the livelihood of those who speak out.

Amazon has yet to settle the lawsuit. The lawyers representing the victims, both current and former employees, will not back down and are fighting to make sure the courts hear their clients.

Rover's Place - July 2022

Rover’s Place is a dog kennel company located in suburban Chicago. One of their employees used to work at the kennel without incident until one of the owners learned about said employee’s past drug use.

Upon learning this information, the owner succumbed to their fears, myths, or stereotypes regarding the recovery process. As a result of this fear and lack of understanding, the owner confronted the employee in question about their history of addiction and treatment.

At the time of questioning, the employee wasn’t consuming any drugs. The disability hadn’t presented any issues in the workplace.

The EEOC filed a lawsuit against Rover’s Place in July 2022, alleging the company subjected the employee to a hostile work environment, illegally inquired into medical history, and forced the employee to quit over the situation.

These allegations violate the American Disabilities Act (ADA). As such, the EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

As a consequence of their actions, the settlement mandated that Rover’s Place pay $60,000 and furnish other relief as necessary.

Giertsen Restoration - June 2022

Giertsen Company of Wisconsin, often doing business as Giertsen Restoration , is a construction and commercial real estate renovation company.

The EEOC filed a lawsuit against the company alleging the company allowed a hostile work environment to take place in June of 2022.

According to the suit, African American employees endured a hostile work environment that included…

The situation was so bad that managers who witnessed the racial harassment did nothing to stop it. They even participated in using racial slurs and comments.

Although several employees filed complaints about the situation, the company didn’t address the harassment. Instead, Giertsen assigned one of the employees who complained about more physically demanding work. They then fired said employee in further retaliation.

Such allegations violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The law prohibits discrimination in the workplace due to race. It also prohibits any form of retaliation against an employee for complaining about the discrimination.

The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

The settlement of the suit involved a total of $140,000 in monetary relief for the victims of the harassment. Giertsen also needed to provide equitable relief for its employees, including training and appointing an equal employment opportunity officer. This individual will handle any future discrimination complaints at Giertsen.

RREMC, LCC - May 2022

RREMC, LLC , a Florida-based company, is the third-largest Denny's franchisee in the U.S. At its Brandon, Florida restaurant, a Mexican employee endured a hostile work environment in. The harassment focused on his national origin. The situation resulted in the employee’s termination.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of national origin. As a result of this blatant violation, the EEOC filed a lawsuit in the U.S District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division in May 2022.

The lawsuit resulted in a three-year consent decree approved by the federal court. RREMC LLC needed to pay the victim $45,000 in monetary relief.

The company also needed to…